Marijuana is also known as pot, weed and grass but the formal name of its is in fact cannabis. It is made by the vegetation and blooms of the plant Cannabis sativa. It is regarded as an illegal substance in the US and numerous countries & possession of marijuana is a crime punishable by law. The FDA classifies marijuana as Schedule I, substances which have a really high potential for abuse and also have zero proven medical use. Throughout the years several scientific studies claim that some substances found in marijuana have medicinal use, particularly in terminal diseases like cancer and AIDS. This started a fierce debate over the pros and cons of the use of medical marijuana. To settle the controversy, the Institute of Medicine published the famous 1999 IOM report entitled Medicine and Marijuana: Assessing the Science Base. The report was thorough but did not give a clear cut sure or no answer. The exact opposite camps of the medical marijuana issue often cite part of the report in their advocacy arguments. However, although the report clarified lots of things, it never settled the controversy permanently.
Let's discuss the issues that support why medical marijuana must be legalized.
(1) Marijuana is a natural herb and appears to have been utilized from South America to Asia as an herbal cure for millennia. In this age and day when the all natural and organic are important health buzzwords, an ever-present herb as marijuana may very well be much more attractive to and safer for customers than artificial drugs.
(2) Marijuana has strong healing potential. Several scientific studies, as summarized in the IOM report, have found that cannabis can be utilized as analgesic, e.g. for treatment of pain. A few studies demonstrated that THC, a marijuana element is most effective in dealing with chronic pain experienced by cancer patients. But, studies on intense discomfort including those skilled during surgery as well as trauma have inconclusive reports. A few scientific studies, additionally summarized in the IOM report, have demonstrated that a number of marijuana components have antiemetic properties and are, therefore, effective against nausea and vomiting, which are standard unwanted effects of cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Some scientists believe that cannabis has several healing potential against neurological diseases such as for example multiple sclerosis. Specific elements extracted from marijuana have good therapeutic potential. Cannobidiol (cbd gummies and breastfeeding), a huge part of marijuana, is found to have antioxidant, anticancer, and antipsychotic properties. Other cannabinoids have been proven to prevent high intraocular pressure (IOP), a significant risk factor for glaucoma. Drugs that have active substances contained in marijuana but have been synthetically made in the laboratory were sanctioned by the US FDA. An example is Marinol, an antiemetic agent suggested for nausea as well as vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy. Its active ingredient is dronabinol, a synthetic delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
(3) On the list of main proponents of medical marijuana is the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), a US-based business. Several medical professional societies and groups have expressed their support. As a good example, The American College of Physicians, recommended a re evaluation of the Schedule I distinction of marijuana in their 2008 position paper. ACP likewise expresses the strong support of its for research in to the healing role of marijuana as well as exemption from federal criminal prosecution; municipal liability; or expert sanctioning for medical professionals that prescribe as well as dispense medical marijuana in accordance with state law. Likewise, shelter from criminal or civil penalties for people that have medical marijuana as permitted under state laws.
(4) Medical marijuana is legally utilized in several advanced nations The argument of if they will undertake it, why don't you us? is another good point. Some places, like Canada, Belgium, Austria, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Israel, along with Finland have legalized the therapeutic use of marijuana under rigid prescription management. Some states in the US are also allowing exemptions.
Now here are the arguments against medical marijuana.
(1) Lack of data on efficacy and safety. Drug regulation depends on safety first. The security of marijuana and its components still has to first be established. Efficacy only comes next. Even if marijuana has some beneficial health consequences, the benefits must outweigh the chances for it to looked into for medical use. Unless marijuana is proven to be better (safer plus more effective) than drugs now available in the market, its approval for medical use may be a great deal of shot. Based on the testimony of Robert J. Meyer of the Department of Human and Health Services having a chance to access a drug or medical treatment, without realizing how you can make use of it or even in case it is good, does not benefit anyone. Just having access, without having adequate, efficacy, and safety use info doesn't help patients.