Marijuana has been used as a supply of medicine for centuries - a common therapeutic plant for the ancients. As he technological know-how became a part of how we live, it was considered a viable therapy for a lot of ailments. But, in 1923, the Canadian government blacklisted marijuana. Although marijuana cigarettes happened to be seized in 1932, nine years after the law passed, it took 14 years for the first cost for marijuana possession to be laid against an individual.
In 1961, the United Nations signed a major international treaty generally known as the single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, which introduced the 4 Schedules of controlled substances. Marijuana officially became an internationally controlled drug, uly Cbd Gummies gupta (uae.ownerandlabour.com) classified as a schedule IV (most restrictive).
Also in the treaty is a necessity for the member nations to build government agencies in order to deal with cultivation. Also, the requirements include criminalization of all processes of a scheduled drug, including cultivation, production, preparation, possession, sale, delivery, exportation, etc. Canada signed the treaty with Health Canada as its government agency.
Due to the health uses of its, many have experimented with acquire marijuana removed from the schedule IV classification or from the schedules all together. But, because cannabis was specifically mentioned in the 1961 Convention, modification would need to have a vast majority vote from the Commissions' users.

Canada's Changing Medicinal Marijuana Laws
The wording of the Convention appears to be clear; nations that sign the treaty should treat marijuana as a Schedule IV drug with the proper punishment. Nonetheless, several posts of the treaty include provisions for the medical and scientific use of controlled substances. In 1998, Cannabis Control Policy: A Discussion Paper was made public. Written in 1979 by the Department of National Welfare and Health, Cannabis Control Policy summarized Canada's obligations:
"In summary, there is substantial positive latitude in those provisions of the international drug conventions of which obligate Canada to make specific styles of cannabis-related conduct punishable offences. It's published that these responsibilities connect simply to behaviours associated with illicit trafficking, and that still when Canada should choose to continue criminalizing consumption oriented conduct, it's not required to convict as well as punish individuals that have committed these offences.
The obligation to minimize the possession of cannabis applications solely to legally authorized health and scientific purposes describes administrative and distribution controls, and though it might require the confiscation of cannabis possessed with no authorization, it doesn't bind Canada to criminally penalize such possession."